Thanks, Antoine. > * In some parts of the draft, the authors personalize their text using "we" or > "our" (for instance in section 3.3 or in the introduction of section 4). The > authors might want to rephrase those sentences using a more neutral form. Agreed. > * In section 4.1, I was frustrated by the use of vague terms like "fairly" or > "somewhat" which gives the impression that the phenomenon described is > difficult to observe, and may not require the use of a proper smoothing > algorithm. I'll try to find some more serious-looking terms. > * In section 4.1 and 4.3, the text mentions external references to describe > algorithms that the implementer could be using to avoid strong oscillations in > the route selection algorithm. I would have appreciated to have a rough > intuition of the behavior of those algorithms in the text directly, while > keeping the reference to point to more detailed descriptions. I'm not sure how to do that. Both "exponential average" and "hysteresis algorithm" are familiar terms, I'm not sure how I can make them more accurate without spelling out the algorithms in detail. Thanks again, -- Juliusz -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
