Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Feb 12, 2024, at 21:03, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thank you for your review,
> Responses  below.
>
> Kent
>
>
>> On Feb 12, 2024, at 6:36 AM, Michael Tüxen via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Reviewer: Michael Tüxen
>> Review result: Ready with Nits
>>
>> This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
>> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
>> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
>> authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
>> discussion list for information.
>>
>> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
>> review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
>> tsv-art@xxxxxxxx if you reply to or forward this review.
>>
>> The document is well written, I only have the following two nits:
>>
>> * 2.1.5. Guidelines for Configuring TCP Keep-Alives
>> It seems that the item list at the end of the subsection provides
>> information related to "idle-time", "max-probes", and "probe-interval".
>> One item for one leaf, in the given order.
>> What confuses me is that the first item contains:
>> "but keep-alive messages SHOULD NOT be transmitted more frequently than
>> once every 15 seconds"
>> For me, this applies to not only to "idle-time" but also to "probe-interval".
>> However, for "probe-interval" you provide lower values.
>> Using
>> "A lower value MAY be configured, but idle intervals SHOULD NOT be smaller
>> than 15 seconds. Longer idle intervals SHOULD be used when possible."
>> would have avoided this confusion.
>
> I updated the document to use your text.  Thanks for the suggestion!
>
>
>> * Acknowledgements
>> The authors would like to thank for following for lively discussions
>> should possibly read
>> The authors would like to thank the following for lively discussions
>
> Fixed (in all nine drafts)
Thanks for the quick response!

Best regards
Michael
>
>
>> Best regards
>> Michael Tüxen
>
>
> Thanks again,
> Kent
>

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux