Hiya, On 24/01/2024 09:21, Lars Eggert wrote:
Before I initiate a formal last-call, I'd like to do a substitute of a WGLC and ask interested IETF participants to give this a final read and indicate whether they are OK with seeing this go forward.
The draft seems fine. I do wonder how much work it'll create for the tools folks and whether just omitting the expires header might break external things, so it could be worth adding "Expires: 1 April 2124" or some such, instead. (If that was discussed already, that's ok, forget I suggested it.) Cheers, S.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
