Hi Petr, > Petr Špaček via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Petr Špaček > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. > For more information about the DNS Directorate, please see > https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/dnsdir > > This document specifies very little in terms of DNS interaction. The only > mention I detected is this: > >> 5. Allocation of a Global Unicast Prefix for SIDs >> At the present time, AAAA and PTR records for addresses assigned from this > block SHOULD NOT be installed in the global DNS [RFC8499]. > > Keeping my lack of understanding of SRv6 in mind, it sounds fine, or at least > safe. > > From the DNS point of view, it's unclear why AAAA and PTR record types were > singled out. IPv6-like addresses can conceivably appear in other record types > (currently at least HTTPS and SVCB), and more types can be added tomorrow. I > would recommend a more generic phrasing, e.g.: > > "At the present time, global DNS [RFC8499] SHOULD NOT reference addresses > assigned from this block." Thanks for your review. That sounds like a reasonable change. The reason I had specifically listed AAAA and PTR was that they were the ones specifically called out in the definition of ULAs [RFC4193] and these addresses will have similar limitations in scope. I will queue up this change and include this in the next version after the IETF telechat on 2024-02-01. Regards Suresh -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
