Vijay, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Dec 18, 2023, at 20:51, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-14 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: 2023-12-18 > IETF LC End Date: 2023-12-11 > IESG Telechat date: 2024-01-04 > > Summary: The I-D is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. The document > is well written, with reasons why critical choices in the development of the > protocol have been made. > > Major issues: 0 > > Minor issues: 0 > > Nits/editorial comments: 1 > > Nits: I am not sure what the line numbers in Section 6.4.1 and 6.4.2 mean. > This is the first time I have seen such adornment of code with line numbers > outside of the use of such line numbers in the Basic programming language. > However, the document seems inconsistent in that it does not appear to use > similar line numbers in the pseudo-code in Section 7.1 and 7.2, for instance. > I would advise uniformity in adoring code if possible. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
