Comments to IAB members,
Any statement from IAB MUST be depending on RFC2850, so IAB MUST not add for itself new roles other than what was mentioned in RFC2850 (read section 2 of IAB roles).
While reading your statement , you need clarify, is it within the role of IAB to react to governments_policy_proposals/company_policy_proposals, as you state below in your statement:
This statement is a reaction to recent policy proposals in the [United Kingdom], [European Union], [United States], and other countries that are mandating client-side scans that require access to otherwise end-to-end encrypted content.
Please note for such concerns like that, my understanding is that IAB SHOULD react through the Internet_Society/IETF_community, so did you get a request by ISOC of related regions (UK, EU, US, other) to make this statement to direct those ISOCs concerns?........ If so please reference within the IAB statement those ISOC proposals or requests to make the statement important and within our community procedures.
Best Regards
AB
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:45 PM IAB Executive Administrative Manager <execd@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The Internet Architecture Board has posted a new IAB Statement on Encryption and Mandatory Client-side Scanning of Content.
Read the full text in the Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iab-statement-on-encryption-and-mandatory-client-side-scanning-of-content/
Abstract: A secure, resilient, and interoperable Internet benefits the public interest and supports human rights to privacy and freedom of opinion and _expression_. This is endangered by technologies, such as recent proposals for client-side scanning, that mandate unrestricted access to private content and therefore undermine end-to-end encryption and bear the risk to become a widespread facilitator of surveillance and censorship.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce