Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-delegation-acme-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Valery,

Both nits on the acronyms expansion and terminology have been corrected in the last version.

Thank you,
regards,
Frederic




Orange Restricted


De : Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
Envoyé : mardi 17 octobre 2023 14:45
À : secdir@xxxxxxxx <secdir@xxxxxxxx>
Cc : cdni@xxxxxxxx <cdni@xxxxxxxx>; draft-ietf-cdni-delegation-acme.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-cdni-delegation-acme.all@xxxxxxxx>; last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
Objet : Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-delegation-acme-03
 
Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft defines a CDNI metadata object to enable delegation of X.509
certificates using ACME protocol. The actual operations for certificates
delegation using ACME protocol are defined in RFC9115, which contains a
comprehensive list of security considerations. This document just extends the
CDNI metadata interface to enable leveraging the schemes from RFC9115.

Nits:

1. "CDN" is used in the Abstract without expanding, but it is later expanded in
the Introduction.
   I found this inconsistent: if the abbreviation is well-known, then no
   expanding is needed, otherwise, it should be expanded in the Abstract.

2. "CDNI", "FCI" are used with no expanding before the Terminology section,
which specifies where the terms are defined.



____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux