On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:01 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 15, 2023, at 6:01 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> On the other hand, spending a week or two repeating a cycle to get an important term in the current document seems like a better solution.
If the WG agrees that this is an important term, sure.
Dear Paul and Rich, for what it is worth, the term is used in the industry and I believe documenting its use in a RFC will be worth the extra week or two to have consensus in the WG on a definition.
Cheers,
- vijay
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
