Re: [¯f¬rĵ§i](no subject)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 06:40:30 +0800, clamav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
> 
> Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
> the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our system.
> 
> The following message will not be delivered:
> 
> From: sob@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx

> This mail was automatically generated by TrashScan v0.12

So just how many RFC *MUST* or *MUST NOT* had to be violated in order for this
silly message to end up back on the list? (It may be possible to substitute
some number of SHOULD for MUST items, but it still ends up reading "Bad Network
Citizen"...)

Kind of makes you wonder why we bother at all...

Attachment: pgp0w8j2tNuP8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]