Re: [Last-Call] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Geoff Huston via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >   "Section 5.3, 5.5 and 6.5 refer to "a canonical sequence of octets in
    > network byte order". It is not specified what that canonical sequence
    > is nor is there a reference to a document that specifies the canonical
    > sequence for any of the name spaces."

I think that we generally expect people to use a string, literally, "example.com"
and I think that the words "network byte order" might be what confuses.

Maybe some people would use RFC1035 sequence of labels format though.

In the end, it doesn't matter as along as the entity creating the name-based
UUID says what they did.  Still, I agree that it would be good if we gave
more advice here.

Are there some references you would suggest here, assuming that we just want
a string.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux