On 21 Aug 2023, at 17:08, Wessels, Duane <dwessels=40verisign.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You’re right that we have not been especially precise when using the word “transport.” > The authors did intend for DNS over UDP, over TCP, and over TLS, etc to essentially > be treated as separate transports, or separate ways a client can talk to a server. > > I’m not sure how best to fix this. On one hand, as far as we know, there is > currently not a good term that collectively refers to DNS over UDP, TCP, TLS, HTTPS, > QUIC, and whatever else may come our way. So maybe we need to define one. I’m > hesitant, though, because I’m not sure this document is where such a term should > be introduced, and because definitions often turn out to be like cans of worms. Documents like this one are surely where definitions first arise, to be collated and argued about later during the next terminology draft rev. > Nonetheless, we have taken a stab at it: I think your stab is a good stab. I like it. Joe -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
