|
[Resending from Moderators account]
Hi all
This draft (draft-templin-intarea-ipid-ext-00) is being discussed across three different lists - intarea, ipv6 and the IETF list. As the latter list is for general topics only [1], I am removing it from the thread. Please continue to discuss on the intarea list, and if appropriate ipv6. A simple 'reply all' should now achieve this.
Thanks,
Chris Box on behalf of the Moderators team for ietf@xxxxxxxx
--- From: Robinson, Herbie <Herbie.Robinson=40stratus.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 18:55 Subject: Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-ipid-ext-00.txt To: touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: IETF intarea WG <int-area@xxxxxxxx>, IPv6 List <ipv6@xxxxxxxx>, ietf <IETF@xxxxxxxx> I would agree it must not be there when DF is 1. When DF is zero, there is always the possibility that a forwarding router will fragment the packet. From a practical standpoint, one wants the originator of the packet to provide the option whenever sending to a different subnet.
|
