Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Jorge: Thank you for addressing my comments.

The edits look good, I have no further comments on the draft.

Cheers,

- vijay

On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 12:58 PM Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <jorge.rabadan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Vijay,

 

Thanks very much for reviewing.

We just published version 11 which addresses all your comments.

 

Thanks!

Jorge

 

From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 12:13 PM
To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: bess@xxxxxxxx <bess@xxxxxxxx>, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df.all@xxxxxxxx>, last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-10


CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.



Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-10
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2023-07-02
IETF LC End Date: 2023-07-11
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The draft is ready for publications as a Proposed Standard with a few
nite.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 1 (please see below)

Nits/editorial comments: 3 (please see below)

Minor

- Sec 2, you may consider ordering the abbreviations alphabetically as it may
be easier for the reader to find what they are looking for.

Nits:

- Sec 1.1, s/two new DF Algs/two new DF algorithms/ (unless, of course, in your
nomenclature, "Alg" means something specific).

- Sec 3, the opening sentence is too long.  You may consider the following
edit: s/route, by replacing/route.  It does so by replacing/

- Sec 4.1, bullet d, s/E.g., 50/e.g., 50/

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux