Re: survey on Friday IETF sessions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21-jul-04, at 6:20, Aaron Falk wrote:

In the interest of creating a more informed discussion,
we've put together a short questionnaire to gather some data on
attending meetings from IETF participants.

Ok, that's great of course, but I have two different suggestions:

1. Get a better feel for which wgs can overlap without problems and which can't. (Hint: two wgs with "6" in their name probably shouldn't overlap...)

2. Move away from the session/break/session model. So rather than let the rooms be empty for 1.5 hours during the lunch and dinner breaks, schedule sessions more or less continuously. People who want to eat are no worse off, as they still get to attend one session and eat during another, while those who can't stand overlap now have a better chance of being able to attend everything they want to.


_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]