On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:28:37 EDT, Michael Richardson said: > Even if they do not result in efficiencies in the routing table, I > think they would go a long way to making people happy. If you want to make people happy by promising technically infeasible solutions, I suggest a career in politics rather than technology. Geographically allocated addresses are a *dead* *dead* *dead* end, unless you have some new work-around for the *very real* routing table explosion issues they cause. If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride - but we're the IETF, so we'll settle for a *workable* design for a new bicycle. ;)
Attachment:
pgpOAUEuVa3c3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf