Hi Sasha, “To me this is equivalent to your definition.” Sure, however, I was not excluding any LSP type, and I don’t think we need to, since the actions are really happening on the PWs riding on those LSPs. So if your suggestion is that we should add text to restrict this to static PWs and MPLS-TP LSPs, I don’t agree. That does not reflect what implementations are doing. Thanks. Jorge
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@xxxxxxxx>
Jorge, Lots of thanks for your response. This indeed may be a matter of terminology. A point-to-point associated bidirectional LSP between LSRs A and B
consists of two unidirectional point-to-point LSPs, one from A to B
and the other from B to A, which are regarded as a pair providing a
single logical bidirectional transport path.
To me this is equivalent to your definition. Did I miss something substsntial? Regards, Sasha
|
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call