Re: [Last-Call] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-10

["touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, David…

(See below)

Joe

—

Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist

www.strayalpha.com

On Apr 19, 2023, at 2:30 PM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Joe,

I think we're all in agreement that TCP-in-TCP leads to poor performance. And the document normatively recommends against doing that:

...

So if what you're asking is "SHOULD NOT do TCP-in-TCP", then we're in agreement and that's already in the doc. But "nested congestion control" means something else.

Fair enough, but the best that can be stated at this time is “we don’t know”. It would be unwise to deploy this as a standard while allowing potentially unknown interactions.

So it’s still “SHOULD NOT” use nested congestion control, just for a different reason - i.e.,l until its behavior is better known.

Joe

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call