Re: Intellectual property clarification - please

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:56:46 EDT, Sal Mangiapane <salm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  said:

> Is it the intention to always include the IPR statement and the RFC
> Editor will only "ensure" it when an IPR disclosure has been made?

I read it as "If we are aware of an IPR claim or disclosure, the RFC Editor
will include the appropriate text.".  I don't see any requirement that the RFC Editor
add text protecting against an undisclosed "submarine" patent claim or similar
unfriendly activities....

(Whether such language *should* be added to protect against that is a subject
for another flame-fest, another day.. ;)

Attachment: pgpF14Bco1B3t.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]