Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Jan 3, 2023, at 22:11, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12 > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review Date: 2023-01-03 > IETF LC End Date: 2023-01-09 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: The document specifies the YANG data model for the Network Service > Attachment Points. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > It seems to me that the Network Service Attachment Points are very similar to > Network Termination Points. What are the major differences? > > Thank you > Linda Dunbar > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
