[Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-action-registry-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Yoshiro Yoneya
Review result: Ready with Nits

Reviewer: Yoshiro Yoneya
Review result: Ready with Nits

  I am assigned ARTART reviewer for this draft.

Summary:

  This draft is in good shape and almost ready for publication.  I found a few
  nits better to be corrected.

Major issues:

  None.

Minor issues:

  None.

Nits:

  In Section "2.2. Initial Sieve Action Registry":

  CURRENT
  Note that when "Action Interactions" cell is empty it means that there
  is no restriction on use of the corresponding action with any other
  action, however implementors still need to read the corresponding
  specification(s) to see if there is are any surprising behaviour.

  SUGGESTION
  Note that when "Action Interactions" cell is empty it means that there
  is no restriction on use of the corresponding action with any other
  action, however implementors still need to read the corresponding
  specification(s) to see if there is any surprising behaviour.

  In Section "4.1. Normative References":

  RFC2119 and RFC8174 are placed as normative references, but there is no
  explicit reference to them, and no "Terminology" section also, so those two
  references seemed to be unneeded (at least, as normative reference).


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux