Hi Linda,
Thank you for the review.
SAPs can be seen as an abstraction of customer-facing Termination Points (TPs) with specific service provisions. However, a difference between SAPs and TPs is that (1) links are terminated by a single TP, not sets of TPs while (2) an Attachment Circuit can be terminated by multiple SAPs. Will add a mention about this to draft.
The association between a SAP and a TP is ensured by the following data node:
==
'parent-termination-point': Includes a reference to the parent
termination point to which the SAP is bound. As per Section 4.2
of [RFC8345], a termination point terminates a link in a node. A
termination point can be a physical port, an interface, etc.
This attribute is used, e.g., to associate an interface with its
sub-interfaces as all these interfaces may be listed under the
SAPs of a node. It is also used to link a SAP with the physical
topology.
==
Cheers,
Med
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
> Envoyé : mardi 3 janvier 2023 21:11
> À : gen-art@xxxxxxxx
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-sap.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx;
> opsawg@xxxxxxxx
> Objet : Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12
>
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
> Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being
> processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these
> comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review Date: 2023-01-03
> IETF LC End Date: 2023-01-09
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary: The document specifies the YANG data model for the
> Network Service Attachment Points.
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues: None
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> It seems to me that the Network Service Attachment Points are very
> similar to Network Termination Points. What are the major
> differences?
>
> Thank you
> Linda Dunbar
>
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
