Re: [Last-Call] review of draft-billon-expires-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/25/22 03:37, George Michaelson wrote:

If an expires: field was included in a dkim signature would it alter how you felt about it?

I understand your opposition due to risks of misapplication, I'm asking if authenticity plays any role in this.

Eg if dkim signed and date is after submission date, then I feel differently to signed with an expires header in the past even when sent. The first is a reasonable statement made by a sender. The second can't really to be.

Not sure of whom you're asking the question, and I'd have to see the details worked out before I came to a conclusion.  But I suspect there might be a way to use DKIM (or for that matter S/MIME and/or PGPMIME) in such a way as to address some of my concerns about Expires.

(The devil is in the details, and authentication isn't the only problem.   But it is one problem.)

Keith


--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux