Hi Hitoshi, Thanks a lot for your clarification. BR/Hongji -----Original Message----- From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@xxxxxxxx> Sent: 2022年12月16日 10:11 To: Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao=40ericsson.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Susan Hares <shares@xxxxxxxx>; rtg-dir@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; pim@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [pim] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-08 Hi, > For example, group-address "233.252.0.23" has two source-addresses, which are 192.0.2.1 and 192.0.3.1. The 192.0.2.1 is include mode, and the 192.0.3.1 is in exclude mode. INCLUDE and EXCLUDE modes does not coexist in a single multicast address. So above explanation seems wrong. In your example, if you register 192.0.2.1 with INCLUDE, the application using the group-address 233.252.0.23 only receives content sent from 192.0.2.1(so that content sent from 192.0.3.1 is not received). If you register 192.0.3.1 with EXLUDE, the application using the group-address 233.252.0.23 receives content sent from all node except 192.0.3.1 (so that content sent from 192.0.2.1 is received). Regards, Hitoshi > On Dec 15, 2022, at 16:42, Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao=40ericsson.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Susan, > > Thanks a lot for your comments. > > "filter-mode" may be either INCLUDE or EXCLUDE. In INCLUDE mode, > reception of packets sent to the specified multicast address is requested *only* from those IP source addresses listed in the source-list parameter. In EXCLUDE mode, reception of packets sent to the given multicast address is requested from all IP source addresses *except* those listed in the source-list parameter [RFC 3376]. > > Generally there are more than one source-address for a group-address. Some source-addresses are include mode, and others are exclude mode. > > For example, group-address "233.252.0.23" has two source-addresses, which are 192.0.2.1 and 192.0.3.1. The 192.0.2.1 is include mode, and the 192.0.3.1 is in exclude mode. > > > > BR/Hongji > > -----Original Message----- > From: Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: 2022年12月12日 23:09 > To: rtg-dir@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang.all@xxxxxxxx; > last-call@xxxxxxxx; pim@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Rtgdir last call review of > draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-08 > > Reviewer: Susan Hares > Review result: Has Issues > > Revew: Document is readable and matches Yang for 1.1. > Status: 1 issue > > Is it possible that deployments for the filter-mode be require both INCLUDE and EXCLUDE (see pages. 6, 7 and grouping state-group-attribute)? > > The text says "INCLUDE" or "EXCLUDE". It would be good to know why the authors felt consider the "choice" statement where both "INCLUDE" and "EXCLUDE" would not be possible. > > Is this due to the normal situation for IGMP-proxy and MLD-Proxy in most deployed? > What would happen if both were needed? How can choice be part of an augmentation? > > Also, this review did not consider the automated tools review. > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
