On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:35 AM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As a reminder: https:/
/ datatracker. ietf. org/ doc/ html/ rfc8244 Dunno where the conversation has gone since publication of RFC8244
Indeed. As a slightly less terse version of the above:
Abstract:
The policy defined in RFC 6761 for IANA registrations in the "Special-Use Domain Names" registry has been shown, through experience, to present challenges that were not anticipated when RFC 6761 was written. This memo presents a list, intended to be comprehensive, of the problems that have since been identified. In addition, it reviews the history of domain names and summarizes current IETF publications and some publications from other organizations relating to Special-Use Domain Names.
This document should be considered required reading for IETF participants who wish to express an informed opinion on the topic of Special-Use Domain Names.
W
- Ralph
On Dec 7, 2022, at 2:56 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@
sandelman. > wrote:ca IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@
ietf. > wrote:org This list is for discussing proposals to resolve the issues surrounding Special Use Domains, specified in RFC6761.
That's not enough context for me to know if I care. Is there a list of issues/concerns?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman. > . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwideca --
Rfc6761bis mailing list
Rfc6761bis@ietf. org
https:// www. ietf. org/ mailman/ listinfo/ rfc6761bis
