Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-07.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John R Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-07.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
From: George Michaelson <ggm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:03:21 +1000
Cc: last-call@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <801a6f5d-f8c4-4b53-185e-e3543589b402@taugh.com>
References: <166973210946.22951.15613495979123865103@ietfa.amsl.com> <ff51b5cb-494a-a848-b346-6e7df1d273f5@network-heretics.com> <bd085e0f-9fbf-472c-a2a0-40156afda2f3@betaapp.fastmail.com> <ab3c841b-8e46-a039-0c2d-4f55d7259b8e@network-heretics.com> <5c8f5777-1b59-c1a2-9c79-aacbee60efea@tana.it> <1bd86b4d-f679-295b-8a7c-c2dd06a2d090@network-heretics.com> <CAKr6gn1ZqSeEu43dHE6ScFk6QxxgOO90ZGZ+Ykrhut3LQtcO5g@mail.gmail.com> <6391B5B4.7050604@btconnect.com> <801a6f5d-f8c4-4b53-185e-e3543589b402@taugh.com>

looks good to me. simpler, direct. the security section exposes the
risk concerns.

I'd say "ship it"

-G

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

References:
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  - From: George Michaelson
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-06.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  - From: tom petch
- [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-07.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
  - From: John R Levine

Prev by Date: Re: Our Internet, Our Future: Together We Can Protect the Internet for Today and Tomorrow
Next by Date: Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
Previous by thread: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-07.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-billon-expires-07.txt> (Updated Use of the Expires Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]