Hi Suresh,
Thanks a lot for your review. Please, see inline below some responses from our side.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 5:32 AM Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review result: Ready with Issues
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-raw-use-cases.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.
Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot a NO OBJECTION on this
document. The document is well written and easy to understand. There are a few
minor issues I found that you may wish to address.
Minor issues:
* Section 1
The following text looks a bit out of date since 5G has already been deployed for
quite some time.
"* IMT-2020 has recognized Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication
(URLLC) as a key functionality for the upcoming 5G."
It probably needs to be rewritten.
[Carlos] Yes, thanks for pointing this out. We will rewrite this in the next revision of the draft.
* Section 2
I know the developments are fairly new but have you considered how LEO
satellite technology affects this area?
[Carlos] Good point. I will ask the experts in the aeronautical area in the WG to propose a way to address this comment.
* Section 4.3
Would it be useful to refer to RFC9030 in addition to RFC7554 to point
to related IETF work?
[Carlos] Yes, thanks. We'll add this reference.
Thanks!
Carlos
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
