Jürgen, you did a great review back in April. We recently made a bunch of revisions to constrained-join-proxy. In the end, we have replaced our custom "JPY" encapsulations with a CoAP header. The cost in the end is two bytes, and the result is that it is identical to RFC9031. We have also changed the MTI. There is a diff in the DT, and I wonder if you'd take a look at that and give us your opinion. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
