Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jean,

Thanks! I've recorded these as:
  https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/60


> On 3 Nov 2022, at 8:43 pm, Jean Mahoney via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Jean Mahoney
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> This document is ready to be published as an RFC. 
> 
> Nits:
> 
> General - RFC7807 / RFC 7807 (when used in prose)
> 
> Section 3.1.3 - The entire section is bold in the HTML output.
> 
>   Current:  The "title" string is advisory, and is included only 
>             for users who both are not aware of ...
> 
>   Perhaps: The "title" string is advisory and is included only 
>            for users who are both unaware of ...
> 
> Section 3.2 - a "errors" extension / an "errors" extension
> 
> Section 7 - IANA prefers that a registry name not include "Registry" 
> 
> Current: "HTTP Problem Types Registry"
> 
> Perhaps: "HTTP Problem Types" registry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux