Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 10/25/2022 1:07 PM EDT Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>  
> On Oct 25, 2022, at 12:05, Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> On 10/25/2022 9:34 AM EDT Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Lloyd W wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/global-whitelist
> >>> interesting that the terminology furore of the past few years and the subsequent NIST recommendations (here:
> >>> suggesting use of allowlist/denylist) have not reached far into the IETF.
> >> 
> >> It is a mistake that we will correct.
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > Since it's a list we are all on, I would like to suggest an alternative name.  How about Master-list?
> 
> I consider this email inappropriate and unprofessional. It was a follow up to another one of your emails that as similarly inappropriate and unprofessional.
> 
> Additionally, you keep misusing the last-call list for off-topic messages.
> 
> I ask that the moderators evaluate these messages.
> 
> Paul


It's on topic, relax.  No need to try and make me the next BCP83 victim.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux