|
Many thanks, Dhruv!
Carlos.
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for your review!
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 7:38 PM Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker < noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro
Review result: Ready with Nits
This document defines a mechanism (flags and sub-TLV) to advertise via the PCE
Protocol security required within the IGP being used.
This is a very well written, clear, and sensible document. In my opinion, it is
Ready.
Flagging some potential nits:
Abstract:
Old:
capability. Further, this document updates RFC 8231, and RFC 8306.
New:
capability. Further, this document updates RFC 8231 and RFC 8306.
Question:
The header and Section 4 say this updates RFCs 5088 and 5089; however,
that is not mentioned in the Abstract.
It is! See
In addition, this
document updates RFC 5088 and RFC 5089 to allow advertisement of a Key
ID or Key Chain Name Sub-TLV to support TCP-AO security capability.
Further, this document updates RFC 8231 and RFC 8306.
Old:
The YANG model for PCEP [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] supports PCEP
security parameters (key, key chain and TLS).
New:
The YANG model for PCEP [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] supports PCEP
security parameters (key, key chain, and TLS).
Thanks!
Carlos.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
