On 8/30/22 14:28, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
Does http (by itself) meet the grammar of a non-fully qualified domain name?
I don't even know what 'non-fully qualified domain name' means. IMO, domain names are fully-qualified, otherwise they're meaningless. At best, a 'non-qualified' name is only meaningful relative to some local context, and IMO relative domain name lookups have always been a Bad Idea.
And if you search through various RFCs with ABNF specifications, you'll find lots of nonterminal symbols for which a sequence of any four alphabetic characters is a match. So what?
It's hard to escape the impression that you're trying to trick people into saying something that they probably don't intend, because you won't explain why you keep asking these vague questions.
Keith
