> On 29 Aug 2022, at 15:20, Dan Harkins <dharkins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8/28/22 6:11 PM, Lloyd W wrote: >>>> On 29 Aug 2022, at 08:27, Dan Harkins <dharkins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> I have also been accused of hate and bullying >> was that when your hateful, bullying, "Les White" internet drafts were removed from the IETF > > Wow, a "when did you stop beating your wife" question! > > My drafts were sarcasm and parody. But you're accusing me of > hate and bullying. The phrase used by Lars and the IESG on removing Harkins' drafts was "racist and deeply disrespectful" > You might want to get that checked out [1]. Ohta was recently thrown off this list for calling others stupid. Harkins has just called me mentally deficient - that is, stupid - for asking a question he dislikes, but he has put that ad-hominem insult in the reference below. That is the behaviour of a bully who recognises that what he is doing is wrong and needs to be hidden. Do judge Harkins by his actions. One would hope the moderators would be consistent here. > For the record, no, the accusations of hate and bullying by a person > who told me I needed to be "culled" was not in response to those > drafts. Well, was it in response to Harkins receiving a warning on the terminology mailing list in November 2021, when he was being a bully? Was it in response to Harkins receiving a final public warning on the gendispatch list in April 2021, when he was being a bully? Or was it in response to one of the many, many, other times when Harkins has behaved as a boor, insulting people, when he was being a bully? Harkins gets accused of bullying because Harkins is a bully. Why is bullying allowed on IETF mailing lists? L. > > Dan. > > [1] https://www.healthcentral.com/article/inability-to-recognize-sarcasm-could-signal-frontotemporal-dementia > > -- > "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to > escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius >
