--On Monday, August 22, 2022 16:01 +0000 "Gould, James" <jgould@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John, > > How about if we change the approach to use the well-understood > command-response extension? If things were changed to create an extension type that is defined in RFC 5730 rather than creating a new type, that would certainly eliminate the need to update 5730 (or explain clearly why that was not necessary). That, of course, leaves the more substantive SMTPUTF8 issues, particularly the need for a slot for an alternate all-ASCII address. thanks, john -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
