On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:33 PM Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 18 Aug 2022, at 14:31, Gould, James wrote:
> By creating a standard around draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai it should decrease diversity of proprietary extensions with adding EAI support to EPP.
Indeed it will, as long as the specification on how to do it is stringent enough. I just wanted to reemphasise what John Klensin wrote -- a warning that there should not be "too many degrees of freedom" in the specification created.
There isn't :)
Peers either agree on EAI addresses or not. Everything else is beyond the IETF scope.
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
