On 18 Aug 2022, at 14:31, Gould, James wrote: > By creating a standard around draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai it should decrease diversity of proprietary extensions with adding EAI support to EPP. Indeed it will, as long as the specification on how to do it is stringent enough. I just wanted to reemphasise what John Klensin wrote -- a warning that there should not be "too many degrees of freedom" in the specification created. Patrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call