> On Aug 17, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2022-08-17, at 16:54, Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Generic_Headers /= (
>
> This is unfortunately not doing the right thing, as it tries to turn generic headers into a type choice with a second alternative.
>
> The way Generic_Headers is defined in 8152 does not lend itself to expanding it.
>
> (TBD10 and TBD11 also don’t quite act like generic headers, because you may need to include them in crit.)
>
> The extension point actually is in the second line of the group (8152, Section 3):
>
> header_map = {
> Generic_Headers,
> * label => values ;;; extension point
> }
>
> No socket or similar construct is provided here to make the link to extensions explicit, so unless we want to retrofit our own socket here, I’d just say:
>
> CountersignatureV2_header = (
> TBD10 => COSE_Countersignature / [+COSE_Countersignature]
> )
>
> Countersignature0V2_header = (
> TBD11 => COSE_Countersignature0
> )
>
>
> Grüße, Carsten
Carsten:
Thanks for catching this. I have incorporated your suggestion into my edit buffer.
Russ
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
