I agree with Lloyd. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 5:29 PM Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > not formally, since the outputs of the git wg were informational. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/git/documents/ > > as revision control systems go, git seems to me to be spectacularly ill-suited to the IETF and editing of text documents, rather than for the kernel source tree it was designed for. > > git is in fashion, and fashions pass. > > Lloyd Wood > lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx > > On 11 Aug 2022, at 04:58, Fernando Gont <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, All, > > Since we seem to have formally embraced Github, this might be of interest: https://cryptobriefing.com/circle-github-comply-with-tornado-cash-sanctions/ > > P.S.: No, I don't have a specific proposal. -- although nothing would prevent us from e.g. running gitlab ourselves, I guess -- still, not sure the extent to which we'd be relieved of the same issues (as previously discussed in other threads). > > Thanks, > -- > Fernando Gont > e-mail: fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx > PGP Fingerprint: 7F7F 686D 8AC9 3319 EEAD C1C8 D1D5 4B94 E301 6F01 >
