| not formally, since the outputs of the git wg were informational.
as revision control systems go, git seems to me to be spectacularly ill-suited to the IETF and editing of text documents, rather than for the kernel source tree it was designed for.
git is in fashion, and fashions pass. Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx On 11 Aug 2022, at 04:58, Fernando Gont <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, All,
Since we seem to have formally embraced Github, this might be of interest: https://cryptobriefing.com/circle-github-comply-with-tornado-cash-sanctions/
P.S.: No, I don't have a specific proposal. -- although nothing would prevent us from e.g. running gitlab ourselves, I guess -- still, not sure the extent to which we'd be relieved of the same issues (as previously discussed in other threads).
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 7F7F 686D 8AC9 3319 EEAD C1C8 D1D5 4B94 E301 6F01
|
