Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] [Uta] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 Jul 2022, Rob Sayre wrote:

cover the maximal-compatibility concerns for 1.2, but recommend 1.3 and don't require 1.2.

If someone wrote a new app implementation and follows this advise by
only implementing TLS 1.3, how well would it interoperate with existing
apps/servers it needs to talk to? I feel this would not go well.

The text could say something along the lines of "SHOULD implement TLS
1.2 unless it is known that for its application TLS 1.3 is widely
available, or is a Green Field deployment where all parties are known
to support TLS 1.3".

Paul

--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux