Re: [Last-Call] [tcpm] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-07

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 4, 2022, at 12:39 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> I think the crux is here: 
> 
> > remotely managed.
> 
> For me YANG is about visibility (or nowadays observability) (like was/is SNMP MIB) and not about remote management.

I think we disagree on the nature of network management. 

> I would never set any TCP parameters remotely as it does not make sense. That's role of client app via socket API. 
> 
> So lot's of TCP parameters makes sense to me to observe state of TCP session irrespective on what is the client above it from remote controller. Especially that telemetry may use YANG format for packing this info. 
> 
> Then what is missing - everything which I could see by using local OS hooks into kernel. That is all TCP parameters as well as connection state. 

You’re describing a debugging too, not a network management tool.

Joe


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux