Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG

To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG
From: Larry Masinter <LMM@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:56:28 -0700
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <7609D78E-39C0-47DD-9A1B-7D2126FC8E60@akamai.com>
References: <ED90C87AEF388AB3BF7CABCF@PSB> <d92b60a6-22a0-1790-2c1d-adf27e95a19d@gmail.com> <5e7888ed-5acc-36d3-e148-1c253366cebc@network-heretics.com> <7609D78E-39C0-47DD-9A1B-7D2126FC8E60@akamai.com>

Post last-call changes are reviewed by authors, wg chairs, ad and now AUTH48-list reviewers.

If an objectionable change is made despite those reviews, there is the recourse of errata or an "updates" RFC.

I think the situation is covered.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG
  - From: John C Klensin

References:
- Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG
  - From: Salz, Rich