On 24/06/2022 10:28, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On 2022-06-24, at 10:54, tom petch <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The I-D was revised to include a YANG leaf 'language' with a horrendous YANG pattern spanning 25 lines.
That is hilarious!
Thanks for the pointer.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29.html
Search for “leaf language {” or use a Chrome-specific URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29.html#:~:text=leaf%20language%20%7B
So they did copy the ABNF from RFC 5646, turned it into a regex, and copied it in…
Maybe the regex we have in
https://github.com/core-wg/core-problem-details/pull/40
would have been a bit more easy to handle.
I do not know where the authors went. The I2NSF list is not one for
discussion, rather for fait accompli, a revised I-D appearing along with
a large PDF that refers to comments and resolution but in a format that
discourages me from trying to see what has been done and why. AD
comments, such as Francesca's, by contrast, are clear and straightforward.
Anyhow, Ira's comment about copying from an RFC caught my eye as this
YANG pattern, right or wrong, has been replicated in other I2NSF I-D and
since Francesca has made similar comments about other WG I-D I can see
that pattern getting copied elsewhere. I have suggested on the NETMOD
list that this is one for 6991bis but that I-D has taken a very long
time to get past WGLC so I suspect that the reaction will not be positive.
Tom Petch
Grüße, Carsten
.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
