Hi Tom, Many thanks for again reading this draft. These are all good catches. We have addressed all points noted below in the new version -07, except for one comment: We have kept in -07 the IP address modeling that includes the zone. My own understand so far is that the models with the zone are the default in many YANG models. As a result, we probably need a reason not to allow a zone in draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp. Allowing it seems a more conservative approach, and therefore we have not changed this in -07. Yet, further feedback on the use of the zone would really be welcome. Version -07 tries to address also other IETF last call reviews and thus includes several changes. Please have a look at the new version (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-07) or the diff (https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-07) and let us know if more is needed. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: t petch <ietfa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 11:00 AM > To: last-call@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp@xxxxxxxx; tcpm@xxxxxxxx; tcpm-chairs@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [tcpm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-06.txt> (A YANG > Model for Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Configuration) to Proposed > Standard > > On 16/02/2022 22:42, The IESG wrote: > > > > The IESG has received a request from the TCP Maintenance and Minor > Extensions > > WG (tcpm) to consider the following document: - 'A YANG Model for > > Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Configuration' > > Some stray thoughts. > > All the IP address objects use the format that includes the zone; is > this intended? > > You mention the i2nsf-capability-data-model as an example of modelling > TCP. i2nsf-nsf-facing could be another. > > The TLP in the YANG module is out of date (like the Copyright date). > > The example uses port 80 which is traditionally insecure. A secure port > might set a better example. > > Tom Petch > > > <draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-06.txt> as Proposed Standard > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2022-03-02. Exceptionally, comments may > > be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning > > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > Abstract > > > > > > This document specifies a minimal YANG model for TCP on devices that > > are configured by network management protocols. The YANG model > > defines a container for all TCP connections and groupings of > > authentication parameters that can be imported and used in TCP > > implementations or by other models that need to configure TCP > > parameters. The model also includes basic TCP statistics. The model > > is compliant with Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) > > (RFC 8342). > > > > > > > > > > The file can be obtained via > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp/ > > > > > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tcpm mailing list > > tcpm@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm > > . > > -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
