Re: Last Call: 'The IESG and RFC Editor documents: Procedures' to BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi -

> From: "Fred Templin" <ftemplin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>; <iesg@xxxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; <ftemplin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Last Call: 'The IESG and RFC Editor documents: Procedures' to BCP
...
> I have never seen such a statement appearing in an I-D before.
> Is this a standard statement for such procedural documents?
> And,  is the intention that it be removed (by the RFC editor,
> I guess) before publishing as BCP?
...

RFC 3667 clause 5.5 says it's required in all IETF documents.
None of the exceptions listed in clause 5.6 would appear to apply.

Randy



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]