Re: Last Call: 'The IESG and RFC Editor documents: Procedures' to BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Harald,

I had a question on this that may be somewhat related to Pekka's.
On the final page of the document, we find:

Disclaimer of Validity

This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.



I have never seen such a statement appearing in an I-D before. Is this a standard statement for such procedural documents? And, is the intention that it be removed (by the RFC editor, I guess) before publishing as BCP?

Thanks - Fred
ftemplin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 7 May 2004, The IESG wrote:

The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering Group
to consider the following document:

- 'The IESG and RFC Editor documents: Procedures '
  <draft-iesg-rfced-documents-01.txt> as a BCP

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
iesg@xxxxxxxx or ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2004-06-04.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iesg-rfced-documents-01.txt




_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]