Re: idnits question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tools-discuss is a better place for this (I've set the Reply-To):

On 5/25/22 10:15 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am helping a newbie with a new draft.  idnits has the following warning:

  == Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- there may      comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378      work that could not be issued because of this.  Please check the Legal      Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to determine
     if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer.

If this a new draft that is not copying in text (such as one might do when preparing a bis document) from a Pre5378-era document, there's nothing to do - the warning does not apply.

If you send me your draft source, I'll let you know why you're seeing the warning. I suspect it's entirely because the draft hasn't been submitted at all and idnits finds no metadata for it.


I can't figure out why.  Perhaps it is related to these warnings can be ignored?

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 2246
     (Obsoleted by RFC 4346)

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4346
     (Obsoleted by RFC 5246)

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 5246
     (Obsoleted by RFC 8446)

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 6347
     (Obsoleted by RFC 9147)

And yes, they need to reference these older RFCs.  Or, rather, I am not the one to debate this point.  I am just working with them to get their work out.

Thanks

Bob





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux