Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction problem, etc.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > I am no more pleased than anyone else that some large mail systems
    > misused DMARC to outsource the support costs of their security failures
    > and as an entirely predictable side-effect broke forwarding and mailing
    > lists. But given a choice between being the cranky old man yelling at
    > the cloud and adjusting my mail so it works, I'll take the latter.

My contention is that we (the ietf) should have done exactly what p=reject
said.  They don't want their mail forwarded, we shouldn't forward it.

That sucks for people who are the product (not customers) of these large mail
systems, but surely we shouldn't even waste our cranky-old-man time even
listening to such complaints.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux