Linda Thank you for your review and comment. There was a discussion at IETF 113 LAMPS meeting on CMP Updates style vs. RFC4210bis. Please see the meeting minutes: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/minutes-113-lamps-01.pdf As Russ points out in the shepherd writeup, the WG decided to go ahead with the CMP Updates document and provide a consolidated bis document in a later step. Hendrik > Von: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > As stated in the shepherd writeup: > > When this update was started, the number of updates was expected to > be smaller. It is recognized that complex update documents place a > burden on implementers. So, when LAMPS WG tries to progress CMP to > Internet Standard, a bis document will be produced to combine the > base specification and the updates. > > Russ > > > On May 14, 2022, at 11:43 PM, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker > <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > > Review result: Ready > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > > any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > > <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.ietf > .org%2Ftrac%2Fgen%2Fwiki%2FGenArtfaq&data=05%7C01%7Chendrik.bro > ckhaus%40siemens.com%7Cc00481a3c9f54e3dff6008da36c89120%7C38ae3bcd > 95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637882532734420467%7CUnknow > n%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haW > wiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Z7a2Z5zBCzGLORxXqEn > fTWfqBrcMkzse6mgafHKNLgY%3D&reserved=0>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-18 > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > > Review Date: 2022-05-14 > > IETF LC End Date: 2022-05-11 > > IESG Telechat date: 2022-06-02 > > > > Summary: > > This document describes the changes to the Certificate Management > > protocol and explains why the changes are needed. The description is very > clear. > > > > Major issues: None > > > > Minor issues: None > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Will the updated CMP be published as a whole? instead of requiring > > readers to refer to multiple RFCs? > > > > Thanks, Linda Dunbar > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Spasm mailing list > > Spasm@xxxxxxxx > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. > > > ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspasm&data=05%7C01%7Chendrik.broc > k > > > haus%40siemens.com%7Cc00481a3c9f54e3dff6008da36c89120%7C38ae3bcd9 > 5794f > > > d4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637882532734420467%7CUnknown%7CT > WFpbGZsb3 > > > d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3 > D%7 > > > C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VPD3Yv4dcvw6fC1pX%2FA%2BJanVvF9OfkDoZ > hhMwodHn > > Dw%3D&reserved=0 -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
