Re: [Last-Call] [lamps] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As stated in the shepherd writeup:

  When this update was started, the number of updates was expected to
  be smaller.  It is recognized that complex update documents place a
  burden on implementers.  So, when LAMPS WG tries to progress CMP to
  Internet Standard, a bis document will be produced to combine the
  base specification and the updates.

Russ

> On May 14, 2022, at 11:43 PM, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-18
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review Date: 2022-05-14
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-05-11
> IESG Telechat date: 2022-06-02
> 
> Summary:
> This document describes the changes to the Certificate Management protocol and
> explains why the changes are needed. The description is very clear.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> Will the updated CMP be published as a whole? instead of requiring readers to
> refer to multiple RFCs?
> 
> Thanks, Linda Dunbar
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux