Roman Danyliw wrote:
There is community consensus [1] to execute the FTP retirement plan [2].
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vi-8bFqlgBFjB2jJ1SIAGHiNRdg/
That's rather an IESG decision to manage IETF based on collective stupidities of committees. Jared Mauch wrote: > Either the service is too difficult and painful to run, which is what > was told to the community, or it’s not and posting a tombstone file > gives an impression there was not accuracy in that messaging. Right. But, see above. Masataka Ohta
